<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Hawaii News and Island Information</title>
	<atom:link href="http://damontucker.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://damontucker.com</link>
	<description>Hawaii News and Island Information</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 21:49:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Bill Drafted to Squash Free Speech&#8230; Please Don&#8217;t Pass Senate Bill 2104, by CSE</title>
		<link>http://damontucker.com/2012/02/10/bill-drafted-to-squash-free-speech-please-dont-pass-senate-bill-2104/#comment-24254</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CSE]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 21:49:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://damontucker.com/?p=49752#comment-24254</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;directed at a specific person and causes that person emotional distress and serves no legitimate purpose, together with the required specific intent, is harassment.&quot;

Questions for the smarty-pants:

So if I say BOH is the worst bank I have ever dealt with, in different forums, a face book page, anywhere,. - then I could go to jail if BOH thought I was harassing them, instead of just expressing my utter distaste for BOH?

Does this mean, because I dont have the law knowledge that others seem to have, that this could eliminate any satirical cartoons in the op-ed section of any of our local newspapers? 

When does someone cross the line from private to public figure if public figures are not included?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;directed at a specific person and causes that person emotional distress and serves no legitimate purpose, together with the required specific intent, is harassment.&#8221;</p>
<p>Questions for the smarty-pants:</p>
<p>So if I say BOH is the worst bank I have ever dealt with, in different forums, a face book page, anywhere,. &#8211; then I could go to jail if BOH thought I was harassing them, instead of just expressing my utter distaste for BOH?</p>
<p>Does this mean, because I dont have the law knowledge that others seem to have, that this could eliminate any satirical cartoons in the op-ed section of any of our local newspapers? </p>
<p>When does someone cross the line from private to public figure if public figures are not included?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Woman Dies in South Kona Car Crash&#8230; Police Arrest Her Before She Dies by Laura Kinoshita</title>
		<link>http://damontucker.com/2012/02/13/woman-dies-in-south-kona-car-crash/#comment-24253</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Laura Kinoshita]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 21:30:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://damontucker.wordpress.com/?p=49798#comment-24253</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Condolences to the family for this tragic accident. Small correction to the story -- 8:19 am on account the accident occurred 2:26am]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Condolences to the family for this tragic accident. Small correction to the story &#8212; 8:19 am on account the accident occurred 2:26am</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Milk of Human Kindness &#8211; With Pictures by Jessica</title>
		<link>http://damontucker.com/2009/05/29/milk-of-human-kindness-with-pictures/#comment-24220</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jessica]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 00:40:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://damontucker.com/?p=16404#comment-24220</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don&#039;t feel bad for Tom at all. Maybe this is what he gets for being so distasteful and outright rude to so many people in the Puna community. Karma&#039;s a bitch.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t feel bad for Tom at all. Maybe this is what he gets for being so distasteful and outright rude to so many people in the Puna community. Karma&#8217;s a bitch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Bill Drafted to Squash Free Speech&#8230; Please Don&#8217;t Pass Senate Bill 2104, by K</title>
		<link>http://damontucker.com/2012/02/10/bill-drafted-to-squash-free-speech-please-dont-pass-senate-bill-2104/#comment-24219</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[K]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 00:17:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://damontucker.com/?p=49752#comment-24219</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[your response to my post in no way relates to what I said. You really need a brush up on Constitutional law.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>your response to my post in no way relates to what I said. You really need a brush up on Constitutional law.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Bill Drafted to Squash Free Speech&#8230; Please Don&#8217;t Pass Senate Bill 2104, by Damon</title>
		<link>http://damontucker.com/2012/02/10/bill-drafted-to-squash-free-speech-please-dont-pass-senate-bill-2104/#comment-24211</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Damon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 22:12:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://damontucker.com/?p=49752#comment-24211</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;For over a decade the government has been trying to thwart freedom of speech on the Internet, and for years the courts have been finding the attempts unconstitutional. It is not the role of the government to decide what people can see and do on the Internet. Those are personal decisions that should be made by individuals and their families.&quot;

http://www.aclu.org/free-speech/supreme-court-refuses-revive-online-censorship-law]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;For over a decade the government has been trying to thwart freedom of speech on the Internet, and for years the courts have been finding the attempts unconstitutional. It is not the role of the government to decide what people can see and do on the Internet. Those are personal decisions that should be made by individuals and their families.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.aclu.org/free-speech/supreme-court-refuses-revive-online-censorship-law" rel="nofollow">http://www.aclu.org/free-speech/supreme-court-refuses-revive-online-censorship-law</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
