We’re Standing United with Agriculture to Protect the Future of Farming in Hawaii
Papaya Trees Destroyed by Machete in Puna
“Our organization is participating in this lawsuit because we have cause and want to stand with farmers, ranchers and growers when unfair and unnecessary laws and regulations threaten our livelihood.
“Bill 113 will make it illegal to grow some genetically modified (GM) plants, including valuable food and feed crops and flowers. By prohibiting the use of these crops that have been deemed by the government and scientific experts to be perfectly safe, Bill 113 is a direct assault on our ‘right to farm’ and essentially criminalizes those who rely on the tools of modern biotechnology to foster productivity.”
“United we stand, divided we fall”
Signed into law on December 5, 2013, Hawaii County enacted Bill 113, which imposes a county-wide ban on the development, propagation, cultivation, and open-air testing of most genetically engineered (GE) crops.
Plaintiffs represent a broad cross-section of Hawaii Island farmers and related businesses that rely on GE crops, including disease-resistant papaya, as well as technology companies that develop, test, and commercialize valuable, new GE agricultural products.
Farmers and Agriculture Associations are standing United; participating in this suit, which seeks to invalidate and enjoin the County of Hawaii from enforcing County Ordinance 13-121 (“Bill 113”). The suit alleges that the bill:
- is preempted under federal law
- is preempted under state law
- violates the Interstate Commerce Clause of the U.S. Constitution
- presents a regulatory taking in violation of the HI Constitution
- Hawaii Floriculture and Nursery Association
- Hawaii Papaya Industry Association
- Big Island Banana Growers Association
- Hawaii Cattlemen’s Council
- Biotechnology Industry Organization
- Pacific Floral Exchange
- Richard Ha
- Jason Moniz
- Gordon Inouye
- Eric Tanouye
- Bill 113 cripples farmers’ current and future ability to farm GE crops, imposes extreme burdens on local agriculture and violates Federal and Hawaii law.
- Despite the central role of GE crops in modern commercial agriculture and their long history of safe use in Hawaii and around the world, Bill 113 imposes a near-blanket ban on new cultivation, propagation, development, and open-air testing of such crops in the County.
Bill 113 is backed by no findings or evidence that GE crops are in any way harmful, or in any way endanger the local environment.
Using the “precautionary principle,” Bill 113 is in direct conflict with determinations made by expert federal agencies, and seeks to outlaw agricultural activities that the federal government has specifically authorized following thorough scientific reviews.
- Farming GE crops has also long been a generally accepted agricultural practice locally and GE crops have been vitally important to the County of Hawaii.
In the 1990s, Hawaii’s papaya industry was devastated by the ringspot virus. The development of a GE variety of papaya that is resistant to the virus is widely credited with saving the industry.
The resulting Rainbow GE variety of papaya now accounts for approximately 85 percent of papaya grown in the County and is widely sold throughout the United States and in other nations.
County farmers support federally-approved testing to develop new disease-resistant papaya and banana plants and floral varieties that resist harmful insect pests and bacteria.
- GE crops not only help farmers, but contribute to food security for the island. By banning any use of new GE crops, Hawaii consumers can expect increases in food costs, business costs, and pesticide use.
- If farmers in Hawaii are unable to farm efficiently and productively, more costly foods will need to be imported.
- The State of Hawaii has deemed the promotion of “diversified agriculture” a vital public interest. This principle is enshrined in the Constitution of Hawaii, which expressly directs the State – not the counties – to conserve and protect agricultural and farming resources.
Individual farmers routinely incorporate multiple production practices within a single operation. Coexistence is not about health or safety; it is about finding ways to improve working relationships when different production systems are used in close proximity.
Every GE crop on the market today was thoroughly evaluated by government scientific experts, often at as many as three different federal regulatory agencies, through a complex multiyear scientific review process.
Not only have GE crops been deemed safe by expert federal agencies, but multiple other governmental and non-governmental agencies have reached the same conclusions, including the U.S. National Academy of Sciences, the World Health Organization, the American Medical Association, the European Commission, and the British Medical Association.
More than 600 peer-reviewed scientific reports document the safety of GE foods.
GENERA a project by BIOFORTIFIDE to create a searchable database to more than 2000 studies on biotechnology in Food and agriculture.
We understand people have questions about how their food is grown. We need to have the discussion before we prematurely make laws that cripple the Future of Farmers and unfairly target growers using technology. While industry will stand with growers and challenge unfair and unlawful ordinances like Bill 113, we urge people to visit the GMO Answers website (http://gmoanswers.com) to get more information about the products of biotechnology.
The Rainbow Papaya that saved Hawaii’s papaya industry was genetically engineered to resist the ringspot virus. See how it was done by viewing this video on gmoanswers.com.
Filed under: Agriculture, Announcements, Big Island, Environment, Food & Drink, GMO, Hawaii, Health, Kauai, Legal, National Affairs, Technology | Tagged: Big Island Banana Growers Association, Bill 113, Biotechnology Industry Organization, Eric Tanouye, Federal Lawsuit, Gordon Inouye, Hawaii Cattlemen’s Council, Hawaii County GMO Bill, Hawaii Floriculture and Nursery Association, Hawaii Papaya Industry Association, Jason Moniz, Pacific Floral Exchange, Richard Ha | 3 Comments »